On the interpretation of special relativity: Brown versus Janssen

Abstract

Since the appearance of `Physical Relativity' of Harvey R. Brown a discussion has developed in the literature about the theory of special relativity of Einstein. There exist two possible approaches to special relativity: the principle and constructive approach. Both approaches predict the same; both finish with the familiar Lorentz transformations. Therefore they are empirically indistinguishable. Janssen represents the antagonists. Janssen and Brown emphasize that the approaches are not explanatory equivalent. They claim that their approach is explanatory superior. Other philosophers have shed their light on this disagreement. This thesis will discuss the debate between Janssen and Brown and the reactions to this. I will conclude that this disagreement is based on the confusion that for phenomena there exists only one best explanation. Instead, explanations are pragmatic. The context of the question determines the most appropiate explanation.