Trust and moral trade-offs in human-robot teams (HRTs): A comparative study of HRTs and human teams in a virtual military operation

Publication date

DOI

Document Type

Master Thesis

Collections

Open Access logo

License

CC-BY-NC-ND

Abstract

Robots are increasingly implemented in safety-critical environments and function as intelligent and autonomous agents that cooperate with humans in alleged human-robot teams (HRTs). It is expected that robots need to increasingly make trade-off decisions, sometimes trading an individual militant’s safety for a mission’s objective. This can have a negative impact on human trust towards a robot team member. This study tested different moral intentions behind harmful decision-making. Participants formed a team with a virtual partner, either human or robot, to finish two missions. Halfway in the missions, a harmful decision was made whereafter two declarations of the partner revealed different intentions for this decision, both aimed at restoring trust. The declarations exposed that the harmful decision was either based on utilitarianist or deontologist considerations and revealed the partner’s lack of respectively benevolence and competence. Participant’s trust was measured prior to violation, after violation and after the reveal of the different intentions. It was found that there was no difference in trust development between partner types. Participant’s competence-based trust dropped the most after violation. Trust after a competence-based trust violation was found to be more easily restored than after a benevolence-based trust violation. This suggests that in all teams, benevolence-based trust is the least easily restored after a benevolence-based trust violation. It is recommended to be careful in being transparent about utilitarianist decision-making. Suggestions for future research are focused on the examination of the best trust repair technique, possibly through investigating the alignment of human moral expectations and their robot partner’s decision-making. An additional note that contradicts previous studies is that – although errorless design is crucial in safety-critical industries – humans can forgive their robot team member after they make a mistake.

Keywords

Human-robot teams; teamwork; trust; utilitarianism; deontologism; decision-making

Citation